Bhutto Dies; So Will Candidacies; Lots o' Updates

Benazir Bhutto is murdered.
IMAGE: SUICIDE ATTACK VICTIMS

Prez responds HERE

Watch the dopes blame Musharaff. Mush is a creep, to be sure, but he gains nothing from her death and receives only civil unrest and more pressure. Her death is BAD news for him, not good.

I
slamo-fascists would have rather had Bhutto in power than Musharraff since he loved Bush more than he let on.

Bhutto was a sweet and tough woman. I saw her speak in St. Louis 5 years ago. But when I learned she was headed back to Pakistan I knew she was in peril.

Bhutto claimed to blame Musharaff for her lack of security and concern for her life in this Wolf Blitzer clip...

But C'mon. Does this picture represent a woman in total fear for her life?

Does this picture reflect a woman in total fear for her life A DAY AFTER A KID IS CAUGHT STRAPPED WITH BOMBS AT ANOTHER RALLY?

Remember, too. She was SHOT to death. This wasn't some scatter bombing. She stuck her head out of an ARMORED car.
UPDATE: Officials say here she wasn't shot.  Still--she stays in the car, she lives.

  

Our buds at HotAir have tape of McCain, Giuliani and Romney responding HERE.
McCain and Rudy solid. Romney looks and sounds nervous.

Fred chimes in on Fox HERE
 
A-Hole-In-Chief Ron Paul throws red meat to his base and blames--you guessed it--America.
Click Here

Meanwhile, Democratic candidiate Bill Richardson (click here) proves he's not fit to lead by immediately calling for Musharaff to resign. Good idea, Bozo. Nothing like leaving a Nuko-Islamo country up for grabs. Thank God you're not in the White House, Billy.

 

What did you think of this article?




Trackbacks
  • No trackbacks exist for this post.
Comments

  • 12/27/2007 4:12 PM Mike wrote:
    What the Heck? Was this not expected? Since Bhutto returned, how many attempts have been made on her life? Don't get me wrong, please, I do not advocate her death and wish the (Radical Islamic?) environment in Pakistan didn't support that. But Come On, numerous attempts had been made, and if I'm not completely misled, there were folks out there saying that they would kill her if she did come back. She sacrificed herself as a Martyr in the hopes that it would affect change in Pakistan. I only hope her sacrifice isn't for naught.
    Now, how in the world could any of out Presidential hopefuls be taken by surprise by this? The mere fact that they didn't realise this would happen is surreal. I thought these folks were supposed to be aware of world events. NOT Presidential material in my book.
    Reply to this
  • 12/28/2007 9:42 AM Sgt. Keylor wrote:
    Is anyone esle getting sick and tired of trying to understand/beleive the thought process used by these islamic nut bags? Ofcourse there are the "peaceful" muslims but let's be realistic. These folks what everyone to bow before the "profit" mohammed or to die. those are your choices with these individuals. I for one am done trying to comprehend thier motives.

    p.s. Go Mizzou!! Make porkchops out of the Razorbacks!!
    Reply to this
  • 12/28/2007 11:57 AM JD wrote:
    Jamie hit the nail on the head by pointing out that she poked her body out of the roof of an armoured car. Actions speak louder than words.

    Had Musharaff forced her to cancel any of her events siting "security concerns", he would have been demonized for that as well. So no matter what he did he would have been demonized.

    Hillary is all but doing a victory lap because she had personally met Bhutto several times when Slick Willy was in office. in her mind that qualifies her as the most knowledgable foreign policy wonk of the entire field. When wil someone in the press start point out that the big reason for the fear of instability in Pakistan is because they have nukes which were brought on-line in 1997...when Slick was in office?
    Reply to this
  • 12/28/2007 1:20 PM Mike wrote:
    Rioting and Violence in Pakistan ---

    Omy Gosh! There is rioting and violence in a predominately Islamic country and so far there have been no "Death to America" or "The US is Satan" callouts. Yet. Could it be that the Islamic sheep in Pakistan finally have someone other than the US to blame for their own problems????
    Nah, it's probably just that the Al Qaeda rabble-rowsers haven't figured out a way to point the blame on us att.
    I truly hope that this will be a turning point in the eyes of the Pakistani populace. They really need to realize that the US isn't their enemy. That special spot is occupied by the Al Qaeda and Taliban scum-bags.
    Reply to this
  • 12/28/2007 2:00 PM Lt. Listener wrote:
    JD,
    Hillary is such a freakin glory sponge.... I'm waiting for one of these ass wipe Clinton's to claim invention of the Space Shuttle or even the Space Program. You know how in Forrest Gump they, through special effects put him with all the historic events and places??? Just insert a Clinton in his place.... they've been there and done that! Run! Hillary Run! (What clowns!)
    ---------------------------------------
    As for Muslims??? What I never understood was what sort of a religion is it that bases itself on join or die? How would it please a god to have followers that are FORCED to worship him??? How genuine and "pure" is that?

    How would it please a god to have folks kill for him??

    They claim that the one god is the god of Judaism, Islam, and Christianity??? Sorry Islam, your god it's not my God.....not the Christian God.

    Your nutbag murderous hellbound blood rabid killers are not hi-jacking my God like they do our planes...

    Your radicals in your "religion of peace" have turned the world into a firestorm of death... You killed Bhutto because she was a threat to your blood thirsty ways...

    Bhutto told the U.S. she could have Bin Laden's head in 90 days....She knew how to get him.... we need to start with those closest to her and work with them even bring them to power...continue her cause and hope of Democracy.... let's not miss a step.

    Replace death with freedom...

    We need to get Musharraf to push Al-Qaida out of Wiriztan.... Pakistan is an ally against terror, but yet they house AL-Qaida....Keep running this scourge out of every g-damned country they flee to!

    Where is the rest of the world in this effort in Pakistan??? What happened to John Kerry's beloved U.N.??? I understand that the U.N. didn't want anything to do with Iraq..but is the entire world wide fight against terror, only America's fight???? Where is world unity now??????

    You know I can see why Michael Savage is Nationalist! Sometimes it's real easy to say F**k Em'All!

    Sorry but I'm sick of it!

    thx LTL
    Reply to this
  • 12/28/2007 3:42 PM Annie wrote:
    Fred Thompson is looking better and better. He has one of the busiest campaign schedules going but unfortunately, the fifth column is purposefully ignoring him. They ignore him and focus on irrelevant crap of the other top republican candidates. Gee, I wonder why.

    http://www.zwire.com/site/news.cfm?newsid=19136436&BRD=2703&PAG=461&dept_id=555106&rfi=6
    Reply to this
  • 12/29/2007 1:18 AM JD wrote:
    LTL,

    The UN is run by primarily Muslim dictators and European socialists who would just as soon see the US go it alone. We need to pull out and quit pouring money into that corrupt organization. Unfortunately, Bush didn't have the balls to stand behind Bolton and fight to get him confirmed as UN ambassador.

    Actually, this Bolton deal may have been intentional on Bush's part. Bush has since shoved this global warming agreement up our butts and is trying to get the Law Of The Sea treaty ratified with his buddy Biden acting as the point man in the senate; both of which Bolten would have vehemently opposed.
    Reply to this
  • 12/29/2007 3:07 PM Lt.Listener wrote:
    JD,

    I agree that we should pull out of the UN...They are fence sitters, they come out smeilling like a rose by opposing the U.S. in a time when it's the thing to do..bash the U.S.

    Nukes on Pakistan are a world problem however, another country who should also be concerned about this is China. India has nukes and Pakistan has nukes, right in their back yard..China is lazy in the world's problems..talk about coming out smelling like a rose?? China is going to be pivotal in all of this eventually..

    I just get so infuriated at the rest of the world. I am tired of the blood we spill over evil doers and insane scourges, just getting tossed aside as if they don't matter.

    Can you imagine the world's landscape and condition if it weren't for this great country???

    The Nukes and Pakistan will bring things all to a head. There is no way on Earth that the United States will let these weapons fall into the hands of radicals... so be prepared and pay attention to Pakistan and its issues..... The world will hate us for what could happen there...If that government falls apart and the fervor over Bhuttos death continues? You know where the blame will be pointed...

    Even through that tough position for us to be in...we will have to act to secure the nukes, whether we have support or not. Even with the success in Iraq and Afghanistan we will yet have another precarious situation with another Muslim country....

    As much as I hate to say it...but with the mood I'm in over this lately??

    I am ready for anything and I am all for pushing our foot harder on the neck of these bastards... The radical bastards have not even begun to see the power we have at our disposal.. I am sure some would say I sound like a war monger, but I am looking for ending this fight once and for all so my kids are not dealing with these F***ing retards in their adult lives.

    The fight is now. I also want to say that I have seen first hand what Pakistan has done for us as an ally. When I was in Somalia it seemed we had more Pakistani's soldiers than any other ally at the time...it may have been location.. Nineteen Pakistani's were killed in a shoot out with Somali's at "Mogadishu University" They are a great ally to us in this fight on terror...they have to do more though to run Al-Qaida out of their country... I always have reservations on how hard they are trying and why we don't have Bin Laden and how many in their forces or government are Al-Qaida sympathizers...

    2008 is going to be pivotal in so many ways it's staggering. Elections, Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan... I pray that whoever is elected doesn't play into the hands of the libtards and they see what we are truly up against and the future our children could face with pacifist attitude or the denial of the seriousness of radical Islam.

    Thx LTL
    Reply to this
  • 12/29/2007 5:48 PM JD wrote:
    Right on, LT. Unfortunately, it will come down to electing someone with the courage and the will to unleash our true military might without constraints.

    Sadly, no major candidate in either party will be willing to do that absent a major attack on our soil. Duncan Hunter maybe, but he is light-years down in the polls from the rest of the pack. Obama is idealistically so far left he makes George McGovern look like General Patton. Clinton, Edwards, and the 5 main Republican contenders will be too busy fleecing the Golden Goose, should any of them get elected, to really care about pre-emptively winning WW III in the name of nationalism. Rudy would probably be our best bet AFTER an attack, however.
    Reply to this
  • 12/29/2007 6:43 PM Wayne McIntyre wrote:
    LT, we have all pretty much advocated pulling out of the UN. I promise you my brother and sisters it is going to take a bunch of folk getting their MP3 players blown out of their ears before some thing is done. IT WILL TAKE another 911 before the masses want blood.
    Reply to this
  • 12/30/2007 10:34 PM Stephen wrote:
    I still don't understand the "Paul-ites" claiming that we shouldn't be there in the first place (in Iraq), and the problems there are not any of our business. Excuse me, but Freedom IS our business. Nukes in the hands of madmen such as Bin Laden should be of utmost interest to ALL the free world. Our childrens' futures are at stake...
    Reply to this
Leave a comment

Submitted comments are subject to moderation before being displayed.

 Enter the above security code (required)

 Name (required)

 Email (will not be published) (required)

 Website

Your comment is 0 characters limited to 3000 characters.