It's Not George Bush Who "Doesn't Like Black People"....
...As usual, it's black people who don't like black people...
Who needs the KKK when you have bloated has been Andrew Young whoring for racism and disgracing politically active blacks everywhere?
You Go Gurl
Click Here to see Andrew Young embarrassing his race in print.
Here's the video of Young pulling out ALL the stops with images of police dogs, firehoses, marches and HE DARES TO REPEAT THE CHARGE THAT OBAMA WAS RAISED IN MUSLIM SCHOOLS AND EVEN RAISED BY THE CHINESE, TWO OF OUR MORTAL ENEMIES!
It's bad enough seeing Andrew Young jiving for his girl Hillary and trying to ascribe any kind of moral equivalency between a decent man like Obama and a syphallis spitting man slut like Bill.
But isn't this the same Clinton machine that leaked the fake story of Barack Obama being a secret Muslim Trojan Horse?
Don't expect Republicans to take advantage of this tragic irony. They're too busy campaigning against gays--the true enemy of America. Go get 'em Hick. I mean, Huck.
Who needs the KKK when you have bloated has been Andrew Young whoring for racism and disgracing politically active blacks everywhere?
You Go Gurl
Click Here to see Andrew Young embarrassing his race in print.
Here's the video of Young pulling out ALL the stops with images of police dogs, firehoses, marches and HE DARES TO REPEAT THE CHARGE THAT OBAMA WAS RAISED IN MUSLIM SCHOOLS AND EVEN RAISED BY THE CHINESE, TWO OF OUR MORTAL ENEMIES!
It's bad enough seeing Andrew Young jiving for his girl Hillary and trying to ascribe any kind of moral equivalency between a decent man like Obama and a syphallis spitting man slut like Bill.
But isn't this the same Clinton machine that leaked the fake story of Barack Obama being a secret Muslim Trojan Horse?
Don't expect Republicans to take advantage of this tragic irony. They're too busy campaigning against gays--the true enemy of America. Go get 'em Hick. I mean, Huck.
Jamie I am a bit dissapointed in you by your name calling I really expect better out of you.
I to was an early supporter of Huck, and am no longer, but Don't insult those of us who are proud to be a hick!
His week why should the kids pay stance on the illegals turned me off. Because you all now someone has to pay so if not them then we will have to pay for the "sins" of the illegal parents.
Still Love You
LNSu
Reply to this
Apparently in Andrew Young's eyes screwing a black woman makes you black...then wouldn't that have made Thomas Jefferson the first black president?
LSNu - I agree. This Huckabee bashing IS disappointing. Huckabee seems to be the only serious contender from either party talking about how to reform the tax code (Fair Tax), protecting U.S. interests by rejecting the Law Of The Sea treaty (which Bush and his buddy Biden are currently attempting to ram-rod down our throats in the senate), and IMPEACHING judges for using international law as a basis for their decisions.
Instead of discussion on these serious issues, we are being treated to Christian-bashing cartoons of Huckabee looking like a cross between a Village Person and Rambo, due to his beliefs on gay marriage. The only time I've heard Huckabee campaign against gay marriage was when he was asked about his views on it by the media.
My question to Jamie is this - If gay marriage is such an irrelevant issue, which I believe it is, then why keep bringing it up?
Huckabee has focused his campaign on important issues like reforming the tax code, appointing constructionist judges, and supporting the second amendment. Besides, his position on gay marriage is to support a constitutional amendment which would allow the "several states" and "WE the People" to decide for ourselves rather than activist judges or nanny-state politicians...certainly a radical idea for our times.
http://www.mikehuckabee.com/index.cfm?FuseAction=Issues.Home
Jamie, please stop trying to make Huckabee look like the pastor of Westboro Baptist Church. There are much more important issues that need to be vetted. You're still the best, but this is beneath your dignity.
Jim
Reply to this
Honestly-relax..there's a big story here with Andrew Young and his race baiting..it's too bad you've chosen to go crazy because I made a sarcastic reference to your pet issue. No wonder Conservatives' biggest enemies often become each other. This is ridiculous.
Reply to this
Jamie ,
I agree - the big issue here IS Andrew Young's race-baiting, but I'm not the one who felt compelled to water it down from the start with the connection to Huckabee and gay marriage. In fact, I have consistently stated in these posts that candidates' positions on gay marriage - both for and against- should be a nonissue. In my opinion, the government should stay out of the marriage business, letting the various religions define what a "marriage" means and limiting itself to granting civil unions, which are essentially contracts, to any two couples.
Also for the record, my PET issue is the preservation of our Bill of Rights and the Constitution in general. So let's declare a truce here and focus on Young's race-baiting for now, with an agreement to address on a future blog how the Law Of the Sea Treaty, currently being championed by BOTH parties in the senate, surrenders our sovereignty to UN bureaucrats. Mike Huckabee and Ron Paul both oppose this treaty but I haven't heard a peep about it from any of the other candidates.
Jim
Reply to this
Thanks, Jim. I'm REALLY glad you pointed out the non-issue of gay marriage. I'll get to that in a sec.
I have never claimed to always have my head on straight and I let my irreverency and sarcasm get the best of me and it doesn't make people happy all the time. My Huckabee thing at the end there was a cheap shot and I admit I'm cheap sometimes. It is also a veiled signal of my disgust with the direction of the "conservative" movement in this country.
I am more than thankful for your brilliant and gutsy statement that the government should stay out of the marriage business. Now THERE's a Conservative position! Right on. Being for a gay marriage ban is not a Conservative position, it's a Republican position.
And, at the risk of starting another debate altogether, I actually believe I'm being generous in my irreverency towards Huck because, I gotta tell you, he may be a Republican but he's no Conservative. Tax addict, Guantanamo apologist, weak on immigration and I question him not reading the NIE report and, when asked about it, testily blaming his staff for not breifing him on it and (untruthfully) claiming Bush had it for four years.
I think we've seen the sanctimonious and prickly character before and his name was Jimmy Carter. I do though give Huck a nod for his opposition to the Law of the Sea Treaty.
And I also appreciate that you get BMA. This is not a Republican site.
Reply to this
Compensation for racism is still racism ...
I believe it was Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson that remarked a few months ago that Barack Obama wasn't black enough to be the first black president . Maybe the black vote isn't as easy to get just because your black .
ole' Huck Norris , haha ... good stuff allman .
To JD about the fairtax : It wouldn't change anything , if they propose to remove the federal income tax which the national average is about 35% .
And increase sales tax by 28% (which huck is proposing) .... on top of the currents 7% sales tax .... you have the same amount of taxation ... 28 + 7 = 35 .... the only way that would benefit anybody is if you didn't spend a single dime you earned .... You would have to remove it and not replace it with anything for it to fly.
Reply to this
Maybe, but it's a radical idea and would go a long way to defangimg the IRS. A secondary benefit we would have is that everytime the rats in congress tried to raise our taxes we ALL would see a direct impact on our pocketbooks due to the rise in prices of consumer products. This might serve as a better check and balance against tax increases than anything we currently have.
To be honest, I prefer a FLAT tax over a FAIR tax. Steve Forbes is a proponent of this and a Giuliani advisor. But I'll listen to anyone who wants to gut the current system and abolish the out-of-control policing arm of the federal government known as the IRS.
I'll make the point again that by Andrew Young's standard THOMAS JEFFERSON was officially the first black president since he was the first documented president to "have" a black chick (Sally Hemmings). Congratulations President Jefferson!!!
Reply to this
yes Huck Norris, I think I saw that movie. Huck lost everyting but didn't get mad until they shot his dog then he killed everyone. I wish Chuck were president!
Seriously I love Huck and everything you say about him is drive-by stuff. I will vote for him in the primaries. Whether or not he wins the nomination I hope all of them are part of the next administration.
How bout rudy mccain, or rudy huck with thompson at attorney general petraus at defense rice stay at state ??
Reply to this
Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas said that american blacks must face the prejudice from within as often as the prejudice from outside there race.
Reply to this
I think Ron Paul should have a position also in the next administration....
..as head of The Department for UFO Findings In The United States...
Other wise known as DUFUS ????
Thx LTL
Reply to this
Hucks stance on the illegal children turned me off too. And Gitmo.
And on a lighter, albeit gross note, I really could never see what any woman found attractive in Bubba, the white-thighed flabster. All the more reason why Hillary's ambition disgusts me. I really can't stomach their political porn.
Reply to this
If I were black, I would be insulted to the core for what Young said. Again, the baiters are portraying the black community in a degrading manner. And with Clinton of all people.
Reply to this
Huck doesn't even make up his own policies .. they are just dollar store versions of Ron Paul's policies .
Huckabee sure does love raising taxes , I'm glad I don't live in Arkansas.
It's because all of the other candidates know that Ron Paul has been right about this stuff all along and the following is intense for the people, so they try to use the media coverage for their own advantage . But Ron Paul is sincere about it.
Reply to this
Theins,
What do you think Ron Paul's weakest point is???
Thx LTL
Reply to this
LTL - I agree with just about all of it constitutionally with his civil liberties viewpoints , but I also know that if in power he would have to convince 400+ congressman for anything to get done ..... So I think his weakest point for right now would be the Broad Approach .. like "cancelling federal reserve" is a great idea and is an honest constitutional method , but you would have to shut down the IRS , adjust stock exchange , find money to replace it with , etc ....
So the weak point is the immensity of such an overhaul to take place (extreme makeover: Government Edition) , Which turns alot of people off to the idea . But , nothing is impossible so it shouldn't really be scaring anybody .. Our dollar buys less and less each day and rewriting the tax code (current day politics) only holds the problems off for a while making them much larger and worse , but by completely abolishing it the American economy can begin to grow again and pay off the substantial debts . It ulitimately is gonna need to be done sometime by somebody , might as well start now and secure the future for America .
Reply to this
Oh.... and as a side note ... I would vote for Huckabee if Paul didn't get the nomination or run as an independent .
Outside of those two guys , I am at complete loss .
I still think that pictures is funny though .
I kind of think Fred Thompson looks like the creature from the black lagoon , so if you could make a picure like that , it would be funny too .
Reply to this
Everyone, come on now, I still think Bill Clinton WAS our first black president. I bet he's had more black nookie than all of these guys combined. Hell, he'd make Wilt Chamberlain look lame. Don't ever discount Bill when it comes to "Brown Sugar". By Andrew Young's standard, I bet Bill is the man.
(NO offense intended by these remarks, so don't get nuts on me)
Reply to this
I saw this this morning and couldn't believe my ears...Clinton's old friend Andrew Young on how "black" Billy is.. and Harry Smith letting Clinton get away with his flip flop on the Iraq war???
http://newsbusters.org/blogs/tim-graham/2007/12/10/red-f-harry-smith-flunks-anchoring-bill-clinton-interview
Terribly unresearched interview and downright shameful, hell why would Harry need to research?? Kissing ass needs no research.
I will watch for updates and video. More to come from NewsBusters Unbeleivable....
Thx LTL
Reply to this
Here is some video of Billy from CBS this morning...
Flip Flop Flippity Flop.
These Clintons are bald faced liars, but the media insists on brushing aside the lies for a contradictory narccisist that the media themselves have created... He is their constant grab bag of bullshit and they so happily churn it out...
In the video..once you get past Clinton's book push you will get to the Andrew Young and War issues...
BTW- Watch Harry Smith's hands through this interview...he can't keep his hands away from Clinton...
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/12/10/earlyshow/main3598046.shtml
Flip Flop~!!!! I find it hilarious that this charlatan has a website called "My Commitment" ....seems he has a problem with commitment??
Thx LTL
Reply to this
Now compare the above hogwash interview with Billy being asked tough questions....
Chris Wallace equally as a "nice guy" as Harry Smith....Difference is?? Chris Wallace was doing his job...Harry Smith was out of his element and obviously loves him some Clinton
Check out the difference in body language... Clinton claims this interview was a Fox news "hit job"???
No not a hit job, but rather Clinton being outside of his candy land comfort zone...
Amazing difference...
http://youtube.com/watch?v=kNoN403tXU4
Clinton's rarely like to be out of their happy place... That is why Billy is flipping on the War like his wife...they are setting up a new base for their new Clintonian media supported happy place on the war.. Another stand on bullshit for the Clintons.
"They" have to clear their stance on the war and create a new one to win the election...nevermind the fact that it is based on flip flops and lies...after all the media will clear this up for their darling Clintons.
Thx LTL
Reply to this
I don't think we have anything to worry about ... Clinton won't be president , again ...
Americans don't want a dynasty system . Any sensible American should have learned by now with the bush dynasty .
a bit too much , too soon , sorry Hilary now go away .
Reply to this