The Moose Lays A Pile, Leftists Eat
Every once in a while it's fun to let the Moose dump a crap in the woods and watch the lefties devour it like flies.
Case in point: the recent reaction of JeffInNewYork to my posts about libraries and Iran.
I don't know who Jeff is, but I do know he can BITE ME while I continue.
You see, leftists don't have a sense of humor unless it involves getting blow jobs from interns in the Oval Office, stuffing National Archive files in your socks, or anything Bill Maher says including wishing death on VPs.
So it's no wonder that the Grand Poobah Moose figured it would be easy to crap a couple of piles in the woods and see the lefties make fools of themselves fighting over it.
You know, of course, that I said we should burn down the NYC Public Library after the fascist left decided to mimic Mao and put our President and his cabinet in a mug shot and then expected us to pay for it.
No, they don't want to pay for Christian Missionaries in Prisons, but making Condi look like a crack whore in a mug shot for art's sake? A-OK.
Of course my reference to burning down the Public Library was a reference to the extremist Muslims who burn stuff when they get mad. Get it? G-E-T. I-T? GEEEEETTTTTTTTTT. ITTTTTTTT?
Obviously, if I were serious, the Library would be in ashes. Believe me.
And then St. Jeff and his date, "Frank" got all a twitter over the whole hanging people in Times Square thing.
See, guys, That's--What--Ahmadinjead--Does--With--People--(--mainly homosexuals--)--In--The--Public--Square.
You guys get that reference?
But once Jeff and his date, Frank, started devouring my crap with glee everything got much more interesting.
You see, Jeff, after ingesting my tasty crap, started blathering on about how much of a "terrorist" I am for talking about "burning libraries" and "hanging people" in the public square.
Funny.
I and most other BullMoosers are on the record, on multiple occasions, condemning acts of terrorism like burning buildings in anger and hanging people.
I challenge Jeff and his date, Frank, to link me to ONE instance where they have condemned--publicly--Muslim extremist burning of buildings and Ahmadinjead's public hangings.
So far Jeff has only been able to muster "tyrant" to describe a man who executes homosexuals and kills U.S. Soldiers.
So, Jeff. You sure have a barrel full to call me a terrorist when I riff on and even make fun of myself about extreme acts. But when have you ever seen fit to call anyone who actually commits such acts "terrorists"?
You see Jeff, and his message board date Frank, don't care about what is terror and what isn't. They care whether or not any act has the GW Bush name on it.
Lefties like Jeff are fast to condemn a sarcastic joke about burning a building on a Conservative Blog, but there is not a record of him anywhere condemning actual acts publicly.
Lefties like Jeff are quick to express outrage at sarcastic references to public hangings on Conservative Blogs, but there is not a record of him condemning Ahmadinjead's public square executions.
You see, when political hacks put their party before their country, and their hatred of George Bush before the security of their fellow citizens, this is what you get. It is easy to expose these poseurs because, like flies, they love to gravitate towards shit and devour it.
As citizens, these people are mere nuisances. As Presidents, they are deadly.
Thanks for eating my crap, boys. It's been illuminating.
Case in point: the recent reaction of JeffInNewYork to my posts about libraries and Iran.
I don't know who Jeff is, but I do know he can BITE ME while I continue.
You see, leftists don't have a sense of humor unless it involves getting blow jobs from interns in the Oval Office, stuffing National Archive files in your socks, or anything Bill Maher says including wishing death on VPs.
So it's no wonder that the Grand Poobah Moose figured it would be easy to crap a couple of piles in the woods and see the lefties make fools of themselves fighting over it.
You know, of course, that I said we should burn down the NYC Public Library after the fascist left decided to mimic Mao and put our President and his cabinet in a mug shot and then expected us to pay for it.
No, they don't want to pay for Christian Missionaries in Prisons, but making Condi look like a crack whore in a mug shot for art's sake? A-OK.
Of course my reference to burning down the Public Library was a reference to the extremist Muslims who burn stuff when they get mad. Get it? G-E-T. I-T? GEEEEETTTTTTTTTT. ITTTTTTTT?
Obviously, if I were serious, the Library would be in ashes. Believe me.
And then St. Jeff and his date, "Frank" got all a twitter over the whole hanging people in Times Square thing.
See, guys, That's--What--Ahmadinjead--Does--With--People--(--mainly homosexuals--)--In--The--Public--Square.
You guys get that reference?
But once Jeff and his date, Frank, started devouring my crap with glee everything got much more interesting.
You see, Jeff, after ingesting my tasty crap, started blathering on about how much of a "terrorist" I am for talking about "burning libraries" and "hanging people" in the public square.
Funny.
I and most other BullMoosers are on the record, on multiple occasions, condemning acts of terrorism like burning buildings in anger and hanging people.
I challenge Jeff and his date, Frank, to link me to ONE instance where they have condemned--publicly--Muslim extremist burning of buildings and Ahmadinjead's public hangings.
So far Jeff has only been able to muster "tyrant" to describe a man who executes homosexuals and kills U.S. Soldiers.
So, Jeff. You sure have a barrel full to call me a terrorist when I riff on and even make fun of myself about extreme acts. But when have you ever seen fit to call anyone who actually commits such acts "terrorists"?
You see Jeff, and his message board date Frank, don't care about what is terror and what isn't. They care whether or not any act has the GW Bush name on it.
Lefties like Jeff are fast to condemn a sarcastic joke about burning a building on a Conservative Blog, but there is not a record of him anywhere condemning actual acts publicly.
Lefties like Jeff are quick to express outrage at sarcastic references to public hangings on Conservative Blogs, but there is not a record of him condemning Ahmadinjead's public square executions.
You see, when political hacks put their party before their country, and their hatred of George Bush before the security of their fellow citizens, this is what you get. It is easy to expose these poseurs because, like flies, they love to gravitate towards shit and devour it.
As citizens, these people are mere nuisances. As Presidents, they are deadly.
Thanks for eating my crap, boys. It's been illuminating.
Bravo Jamie. But how do you really feel? I doubt that your comments and rant will be understood.
Reply to this
jamie,
wow... you stayed up late working on this. Did it take you that long to think up this nonsense or find the picture of moose scat?
Is moose scat the official logo for BM America now? Get it. BM, scat? G-e-t i-t? LOL
I've found it quite typical for right-wingers to characterize their gruesome comments and imagery as "jokes". Nice try but I don't buy it. I suspect you stayed up so late making the connections.
Now to your nonsense. Of course I condemn Ahmadinejad and any terrorist for their acts. Who doesn't? Burning buildings, torture, hangings, executions, beheadings, bombings... did I leave anything out? These are all hideous terrorist acts and should be condemned by everyone. Let's track them down and stop them. Feel better?
But do you feel that others doing worse than you excuses you of your bad acts? Is flying a plane into a building worse than your exhortations for perpetual warfare? Duh. Of course it is. But it doesn't offer you cover for the awful things you say and do. Get it? Getttttt ittttt?
While you masturbated onto your keyboard, while you spewed your toxic venom into your microphone from a comfortable studio in St. Louis, while you went home every night to the warmth of your family, 4000 young Americans, men and women, died in Iraq, tens of thousands were maimed, in large part because highly compensated entertainers such as yourself supported this administration in invading and occupying Iraq. You do it for money. At least the jihadists have a cause.
Bite that.
Reply to this
Good job on those ass gaskets Jamie. I just cant deal with those shit heads any more. You did them now I cant hardly wait to see the results. Has any one noticed that no matter where you go to post or read their is always a Jeff AND a Frank or that they all have the same chant.....
Reply to this
Sure I'll bite it, but you keep chewing yourself, my friend. You can obsess over the times I post and it's clear you lurk on BMA all of the time. I certainly appreciate all the attention. The only time you ever contribute is when you slither out from under your rock long enough to defend a terrorist and terrorism (love the line: "at least the jihadists have a cause").
But despite all of your blustering the fact remains: you cannot produce any post or any contribution on the public web in which you condemn terrorism or the public hangings. But you're quick on the draw on sarcastic remarks--remarks that drew you out from under your rock and proved you to be what you are.
I'll ask again. Show me anywhere on the web before this morning that you have condemned terrorism, the hanging of homosexuals, beheadings, bombings or anything else. The fact is you haven't. You reserve your harshest criticism for your fellow citizens and your government and wage no criticism of terrorists until prodded.
And money? You must not understand the business. I would make more money with the likes of Hillary or Obama in office. If Hillary gets elected, I will have a lifetime contract.
Anyway, call me a whore. At least I'm a whore for the truth and not a whore for the Jihadists.
Reply to this
I've found it quite typical for right-wingers to characterize their gruesome comments and imagery as "jokes". Nice try but I don't buy it. I suspect you stayed up so late making the connections.
It is quite typical for jihadi lovers never to have an opinion on the gruesome pictures of the works of their fellow jihadis. They just blame 'the right' for making them look into the mirror.
Is flying a plane into a building worse than your exhortations for perpetual warfare? Duh. Of course it is. But it doesn't offer you cover for the awful things you say and do. Get it? Getttttt ittttt?
We get it. You're a delusional wanker with no knowledge of history, human nature, or warfare. Keep eating the scat. We are through the looking glass and it is 1938. You prefer to ignore the words and actions of Little Hitler and the tentacles of islam. We prefer to be proactive rather than reactive. Imagine how many lives would have been saved if Hitler's actions and words were not ignored.
..while you went home every night to the warmth of your family, 4000 young Americans, men and women, died in Iraq, tens of thousands were maimed, in large part because highly compensated entertainers such as yourself supported this administration in invading and occupying Iraq. You do it for money. At least the jihadists have a cause.
Ahh, your mask fell off Jeff. And you are ugly to the core. You are a jihadi sympathizer, an asset to their cause, and the enemy within.
Our soldiers died alongside their Iraqi brothers-in-arms believing in the mission that by bringing peace and democracy to an unstable region and freedom to oppressed peoples, they will be providing security for their own families.
The jihadis cause is one of submission to the will of allah or else.
One cause is of freedom and life. The other of oppression and death.
And as always, the lib will come down on the side of death. And shit on our dead soldiers graves.
*shakes head in disgust*
Reply to this
And shariah continues it's march as Jeff shoves his head further up his ass.
As CAIR tries to censor those who criticize islam in this country - i.e. Savage, looks like the Canadian equivalent is going after columnist Mark Steyn.
http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=NzgzNmFmODNmNDJkMWYzMTdkYjlkNDI2ZTA2NmI1ZTU=
Dead man writing
One of the critical differences between America and the rest of the west is that America has a First Amendment and the rest don't. And a lot of them are far too comfortable with the notion that in free societies it is right and proper for the state to regulate speech. The response of the EU Commissioner for Justice, Freedom and Security to the Danish cartoons was to propose a press charter that would oblige newspapers to exercise "prudence" on, ah, certain controversial subjects. The response of Tony Blair's ministry to the problems of "Londonistan" was to propose a sweeping law dramatically constraining free discussion of religion. At the end of her life, Oriana Fallaci was being sued in France, Italy, Switzerland and sundry other jurisdictions by groups who believed her opinions were not merely disagreeable but criminal. In France, Michel Houellebecq was sued by Muslim and other "anti-racist" groups who believed opinions held by a fictional character in one of his novels were not merely disagreeable but criminal.
Up north, the Canadian Islamic Congress announced the other day that at least two of Canada’s “Human Rights Commissions” – one federal, one provincial – had agreed to hear their complaints that their “human rights” had been breached by this “flagrantly Islamophobic” excerpt from my book, as published in the country’s bestselling news magazine, Maclean’s. Several readers and various Canadian media outlets have enquired what my defense to the charges is. Here’s my answer:
I can defend myself if I have to. But I shouldn’t have to.
If the Canadian Islamic Congress wants to disagree with my book, fine. Join the club. But, if they want to criminalize it, nuts. That way lies madness. ....
..As I say, I find it difficult to imagine. But not impossible. These "human rights" censors started with small fry - obscure websites, "homophobes" who made the mistake of writing letters to local newspapers or quoting the more robust chunks of Leviticus - and, because they got away with it, it now seems entirely reasonable for a Canadian pseudo-court to sit in judgment on the content of a mainstream magazine an magazine and put a big old "libel chill" over critical areas of public
debate. The "progressive" left has grown accustomed to the regulation of speech, thinking it just a useful way of sticking it to Christian fundamentalists, right-wing columnists, and other despised groups.
They don’t know they’re riding a tiger that in the end will devour them, too.
Reply to this
Jeff, the only people that look for "perpetual warfare" are Muslim Jihadists who think that everyone who does not agree with them should be sent to their judgment. Most likely, that includes you!
Certainly I don't look forward to any war, much less perpetual war, and neither does Allman I'm sure. We, unlike you, recognize the need to take a proactive stance in order to safeguard innocent people who WILL certainly be victimized by oppressive, brutal, militant jihadists.
One of my best friends from college was killed in Iraq. He was a great person, stong Christian, patriotic citizen, and someone who actually made the world a better place. Do you? He recognized what he was doing over there was good. He knew the risks, and was happy to take them.
Personally, I think people like you, Jeff, are an insult to his sacrifice. You use what he and others have done for political gain and to vent your personal hatred for Bush and other conservatives. Please Jeff, feel free to leave our nation where you enjoy the freedom to spew this vile thanks to people like my friend, and try your luck in some country you think is less "evil" than one led by President Bush.
Reply to this
"[i]Of course I condemn Ahmadinejad and any terrorist for their acts. Who doesn't? Burning buildings, torture, hangings, executions, beheadings, bombings... did I leave anything out? These are all hideous terrorist acts and should be condemned by everyone. Let's track them down and stop them. Feel better?[/i]"
This would ring a bit more true if you ever offered an opinion that condoned the idea of anti-terrorist action. However, our only impression of you, so far, is in opposing any and all current anti-terrorist policies with no reference to an alternative plan that stands up to any sort of real-world scrutiny. Or am I mixing you up with someone else. All you libs type alike.
"[i]But do you feel that others doing worse than you excuses you of your bad acts? Is flying a plane into a building worse than your exhortations for perpetual warfare? Duh. Of course it is. But it doesn't offer you cover for the awful things you say and do. Get it? Getttttt ittttt?
While you masturbated onto your keyboard, while you spewed your toxic venom into your microphone from a comfortable studio in St. Louis, while you went home every night to the warmth of your family, 4000 young Americans, men and women, died in Iraq, tens of thousands were maimed, in large part because highly compensated entertainers such as yourself supported this administration in invading and occupying Iraq. You do it for money. At least the jihadists have a cause.[/i]"
Apparently in Jeffland, the perpetrators of the worst attack on American soil in history are equivalent to someone supporting an effort to spread freedom to a foreign nation and thereby establish an ally against terrorism in the heart of the Middle East.
I find it strange how the same type of people who complained that we weren't going after the "root causes" of terrorism now complain when we put our blood and treasure on the line to establish a healthy, stable society which lends itself to opposing terrorism. They talked about violence making terrorists. As the surge continues, the mooj (i.e. all the violent guys) are being pushed further and further out of their previous positions of dominance. They talked about poverty pushing frustrated people into terrorism. The economy of Iraq is growing at a breakneck pace with opportunities expanding as security takes hold. They talked about anger at the West making people want to kill all the infidels. With the new strategy of essentially embedding our military in their neighborhoods and cooperating with local leaders, with every soccerball and candy giveaway, reopened school and renewed infrastructure, we are building goodwill that could never be won through dhimmitude. And people in Jeffland want to call people like Jamie "fascists" and claim they have blood on their money-grubbing hands. It would be sad if it wasn't so f%$#ing willfully ignorant.
Reply to this
Gabe,
Great Points and glad to see you back in the written trenches....
I sit back in amazement when I read comments from folks like Jeff and the like. I am convinced that we are paying the price now for flower power and the "Summer of Love".....
We have come along way as an infant country..I am proud of it. It was born and acheived on brains and balls...some folks have neither...
Thx LTL
Reply to this
NYT leaks details of shift in NIE on Iran.
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/12/06/world/middleeast/06intel.html?ex=1354597200&en=6962f773ad92971e&ei=5088&partner=rssnyt&emc=rss
Aside from the fact that once again the NYT leaks classified info that could harm our intelligence agencies and security, "this information does not help burnish the credibility of the NIE and our intel community as a whole, if they are leaning upon such few and thin reeds as a laptop, some intercepted conversations for their surmises." (hat tip - sweetness-light)
Reply to this
Apparently our good friend Jeffery in New York would rather hiney up to the Jihadists than to fight them. If you do not want to stand behind our troops, PLEASE FEEL FREE TO STAND IN FRONT of them. The troops are defending your lousy right to spew such nonsense, Jeffrey, so you should at least thank them for that. I for one am glad that our troops are fighting in Iraq and Afghanstan rather than on the American Soil.
Reply to this
GREAT point brother. Not only can Jeff come up with ONE example of his public condemnation or terrorist acts, of Ahmadinjead. or of any other Jihadist crimes, he also cannot produce ONE example in which he ever has publicly praised the efforts of our troops. Sure he lurks here and uses dead soldiers in his War on Bush, but he, again, has ZERO public pedigree as it relates to standing up for our troops or condemning acts of terror. He has failed to produce ONE example.
Meanwhile his buddy in Iran has hung another one. Bravo, Jeff.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/22116392/
Reply to this